Highly doubtful Bears would just take lower out of the goodness of their heart.*
[
Follow Ups
] [
O-Zone Forum
]
By
Buck Soup
on 10:47:20 03/18/24
[In reply to "
Point is they had better offers from teams where JF didn't want to go *
" by Buck-o-matic, posted at 10:11:13 03/18/24]
Follow Ups:
Exactly .... The Good News ... There's no QB in the 2024 NFL Draft better than Justin Fields . *
-
Silverbullets
[15:56:58 03/18/24]
The linked article says that's exactly what they did *
-
Buck-o-matic
[10:53:25 03/18/24]
I understand. I'm calling BS on the linked clickbait (oops, article).*
-
Buck Soup
[10:59:54 03/18/24]
Totally agree. Fields has a lot of support in Chicago amongst Bears fans. This is an article
-
Poisonut
[11:08:45 03/18/24]
Unfortunately, I agree. Very hard to believe Cgo passed up better offers to be altruistic. *
-
G-Man
[12:17:04 03/18/24]
I doubt there was much difference between the picks, like an earlier 6th round or late 5th round pick *
-
Potsy's PIMPS
[11:36:55 03/18/24]
Probably true, but the trade isn’t an indictment of Fields. Just bad contract limbo status. Same with Baker with CLE.*
-
BayAreaBuck
[12:26:03 03/18/24]
It absolutely show how the NFL values JF, just like BM. BM changed minds in TB tho, maybe JF can too.*
-
Buck Soup
[12:32:40 03/18/24]
A thousand percent. It's the most important position in the game not being able to find a team to pay even a day 2
-
Poisonut
[12:49:53 03/18/24]
Disagree. Eagles gave up more for Pickett because he has an extra cheap year. No competent GM thinks Pickett (m)
-
BayAreaBuck
[12:48:55 03/18/24]
They swapped picks. Pickett and 120 for pick 98. *
-
Poisonut
[12:52:32 03/18/24]
Not quite true. Linked article gives a good explanation of Eagles’ rationale. (m) *
-
BayAreaBuck
[13:18:42 03/18/24]
[
Follow Ups
] [
O-Zone Forum
]